The Music File-Sharing Dilemma Revisited

- Image via Wikipedia
So, here is a simple example of why groups like RIAA and groups like, say, the general public, are butting heads in and out of court over the issue of “sharing” music.
Let’s rewind to, say, 1986. I was a freshman in high school. My buddy was trying to school me on some more alternative tunes and made me a mixtape of stuff including things like The Dead Kennedys and Captain Beefheart. Cool stuff. Really opened up my idea of popular music.
Now, RIAA would not have liked my friend’s behavior but because it happened in a physical exchange between two private citizens there isn’t much anyone could or would do about it.
Cut to today. You just heard an amazing band and you want to tell all your friends about it. You buy a copy of their album and immediately put up a link to your favorite song on your Facebook feed. Bam! You are now an illegal file-sharer under the eyes of the current law, at least as the RIAA would like it to be interpreted.
Far from trying to undercut record sales, you were just trying to help promote a band you love.
That’s where heads start to butt. Where do we draw the line between the very human (and economically beneficial) act of sharing and the clearly illegal line of distributing content to which you do not hold the rights?
This is a battle we are going to see fought in the music world first, but the same discussions hold true for film, TV and even the mainstream press.
The internet has made the act of sharing, sometime with millions of “friends” as easy as pressing a button. The thing is, most people still feel that when they do that it is just sharing and nothing more.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5b42ccd7-330e-4114-8ae8-e71ff763ee80)