A Case for Government Sponsored News
Every day, while walking to work, I listen to the BBC’s World News podcast. While it is easy to argue that no single news source is perfect, and it is even easier to argue that some sort of bias exists in all reporting, I am always impressed by the range of topics covered by the BBC and the sometimes aggressive stance it’s reporters take when interviewing less than forthcoming guests.
Not only is the BBC news far-ranging and challenging, it is paid for by the people of the United Kingdom. From the BBC website:
If you have a colour TV at home, the TV licence fee this year is £131.50. If your TV is black and white, it’s £44.00. People aged 75 pay no fee, some pensioners and disabled people pay a £5 fee, and registered blind people get a 50% discount.
In fact, this money goes to more than news programming, but I want to focus on that element for a moment.
What would happen if the US created a tax-supported news organization with the sort of charter used by the BBC? That charter gives the BBC complete editorial autonomy, although some have questioned the degree of that autonomy. As a daily BBC listener, I have to say they do not seem to go easy on the UK government or the Royal Family. By the way, you can read the whole charter here.
Sure, it might be insane for me to think the government could really just fund a news organization with tax payer money and not expect endless backlash from every fringe group in the known universe complaining that, now that they are paying they want “x” topic covered more and “y” topic never mentioned again – but maybe not.
It also might be crazy to expect that a government-sponsored news agency could be truly autonomous but look at our current news sources – CNN, FoxNews, etc. – and tell me those feel truly autonomous from their corporate owners.
Therefore, maybe it isn’t so crazy to consider a US version of the BBC. It would certainly help keep hundreds of reporters and journalists from losing their jobs and maybe, free from the need to please advertisers with massive eyeball counts, it would allow for news beyond what Britney Spears did in London or what Rush Limbaugh thinks of killing abortion doctors.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=af17ba1f-de61-4e5b-91a1-d204a77cb12b)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=14e300a9-769e-4a4e-8b13-27ea18b99cc9)