J.D. Salinger is really only known for a couple of things. He is a total recluse and he wrote “A Catcher in the Rye.” Oh, and he’s is famously litigious when it comes to anyone doing anything with the material contained in that book.
So, along comes a guy with a fun literary idea: let’s take this iconic teenager and look at what his life might be like at the age of 76. Neat, right? Unless you happen to be J.D. Salinger and then you go crying to the courts that this completely original reimagining is somehow infringing on his 58-year-old novel.
Although the new book, “60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye,” by J.D. California, a pseudonym for a Swedish writer (and the book’s publisher), Fredrik Colting, was published in the UK, a US court is blocking its release for at least ten days while a judge, seemingly sympathetic to J.D. Salinger’s case, considers her final decision.
Let’s consider why this is so ridiculous:
1) While Colting’s book is clearly, and unabashedly, drawing from the original novel, his story is completely new.
2) Colting’s protagonist is a 76-year-old man. Holdin Cauffield was a teenager.
3) The publication of Colting’s book will only bring fresh interest, and fresh sales, to Salinger’s work, at a time when it feels like he is slowly falling out of favor – fewer teens I know today have read “A Catcher in the Rye,” than when it seemed to be required reading in my youth.
4) Salinger comes off looking like a mean, reactionary kook. He might actually be just that, but nobody wants others to think so.
It always saddens me to see one artist trying to shut down the creativity of another artist. I’m sure J.D. Salinger isn’t thrilled by the idea of someone taking one of his literary children out for some fresh air, but liking something is not pre-requirement for its legal existence.
Also, let’s be honest, Colting’s book is out there and anyone who wants to read it will read it, no matter what happens in this single US court.