After the release, and subsequent takedown of the first iPhone App to display naked boobs, “Hottest Girls,” Apple has put out a new set of guidelines to help developers steer clear of a similar fate.
Apple iPhone App “Sexy” Guidelines:
1) Apps containing nothing but pictures of women over the age of 18 will be permitted in the App Store as long as said women are not exposing any of their “bathsuit suit” parts.
2) Apps may allow users to undress said women as long as they only take off a single layer of clothing. Removal of more than one layer of clothing will get you banned.
3) All said women must wear underwear that covers the entire pubic region (don’t make me say the v-word) and at least one-third of the tuchus while exposing none of the separation between cheeks. On top, said women may expose as much boob as they can without showing the world even a glimpse of areola or nipple. Therefore, the smaller said woman’s areola, the more breast can be exposed. Now, nipples. They can poke through the thinnest, wettest fabric you’ve got, but the user may NOT see the actual nipple skin.
4) Apps may allow users to manipulate the breasts of said women via the touch-screen as long as they user is not able to see the actual flesh being manipulated.
5) Similar Apps featuring scantily clad men will be banned due to the fact that they may cause homosexuality, thus violating the App Store’s basic TOS.
Apple hopes this clears things up in the “sexy” App department. Look forward to more guidelines from Apple including “Words and Phrases to Avoid in eBooks” and “What’s Ok to Gun Down.”
Tags: App Store, apple, apps, boobs, boons, breasts, developers, girls, guidelines, Handhelds, iphone, pornography, sex, sexy, Smartphones, Toplessness
Uncategorized | admin |
June 26, 2009 6:36 am |
Comments (0)
So, I had an interesting comment regarding my Girls Rule the Web post in which the question is raised:
“So, my question is, and I don’t think the article answered it, while young women are making a heck of a lot of “noise” is the proportion of quality content from them greater than, less than or the same as what the larger population is putting out?”
As I was pondering this, I read the following on DownloadSquad:
“Maybe the real question, then, is not whether the blogging/coding/podcasting girls of today will grow up to become software engineers, but to what kinds of interesting and innovative uses they will apply their skills in their chosen field. We’ll just have to wait and see, but my sans crystal ball prediction is that we won’t be disappointed.”
Not sure I have answers to either question but I do think it is important to remember that we’re talking about kids expressing themselves to each other, not some business venture or marketing model.
Are their contributions to the web adding something to the “noise?” Maybe not. But is it really the job of teenage girls to provide quality content to the general public. Unless you really dig reading diaries of a 12-year-old (in which case seek help) than most of what they create online won’t mean much to you. It isn’t meant for you, either.
The New York Times has a long and informative article challenging the common assumption that creating web-content is a male-driven world.
“Research shows that among the youngest Internet users, the primary creators of Web content (blogs, graphics, photographs, Web sites) are not misfits resembling the Lone Gunmen of “The X Files.” On the contrary, the cyberpioneers of the moment are digitally effusive teenage girls.”
Definitely recommend reading the whole article.