“Aged News” vs. #IranElection
- Image via Wikipedia
Everyone, including myself, is talking about the stark difference between the mainstream media’s reporting on events in Iran versus the real-time feed of citizens reporting on events via Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and FlickR, among others.
Clearly, we are reaching a tipping point, a time after which newspapers will simply not have a significant role to play in the reporting of the news. Sure, we will always be interested in reading well-written commentary and longer, in-depth explorations of complex topics, but the idea of the newspaper as a place for actual news is becoming laughable.
As I mentioned the other day, my favorite part of the Daily Show takedown of the New York Times was when Jason Jones called said the paper was full of “aged news.” It looks like the term is catching on:
The speed of change is leaving newspapers dead in the water. While some like the Guardian have managed to maintain active blogs on the events unfolding, most seem unable to compete with realtime speed, what use is their aged news when we can’t use it today? LINK
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2b1fc0a9-e529-4e6e-8fd3-580f6d2f857a)